Local coding agents are good now, but only if you babysit them

Local coding agents have shown improved utility for tasks such as small fixes and repository navigation, but they require close supervision to avoid introducing errors or deviating from intended tasks. The recommended workflow involves executing small tasks, running tests, checking diffs, and manually correcting issues, indicating that while these agents can save time, their current state necessitates ongoing human oversight. This highlights the need for further advancements in the autonomy and reliability of coding agents for practical deployment in software development.